Articles
Practice Guidance & Analysis
The Safety Comms Skill File: Alerts Workers Actually Read
Safety alerts fail when they are generic, long and blame-flavoured. A safety comms skill file encodes the plain-language, site-specific standard once, so every alert, toolbox intro and bulletin meets it, and every draft still stops at the HSR and a competent person before release.
Read article
AI Can Stress-Test an Emergency Plan. It Cannot Run the Drill.
AI can challenge a de-identified emergency plan against scenarios, missing roles, communication failures and changed workplace conditions. It cannot test how people behave under pressure. Regulation 43 keeps the testing, the training and the drill itself human.
Read article
AI Can Draft WHS Training. It Cannot Verify Competence.
AI can draft WHS learning objectives, scenarios, quizzes and facilitator notes from verified source material. It cannot observe a worker performing the task or certify competence. This guide sets out where the two human gates sit and how to run the drafting workflow without letting a completion record impersonate a competent worker.
Read article
Rolling Out AI Is a Workplace Change: Consult and Risk-Assess First
Switching on an AI tool that allocates, paces, measures, or monitors work is a change to the work under Australian WHS law. The duty to consult workers and risk-assess it sits with the business before go-live, and NSW has now written it into statute.
Read article
AI Can Draft a SWMS in Seconds. The Site Walk and the Consultation Cannot Be Automated.
AI can produce a formatted safe work method statement in under a minute, but for high-risk construction work a SWMS is a regulated document. The site walk and the consultation that make it lawful are exactly the parts AI cannot do.
Read article
An AI Safety Control Is Still Just a Control. The Duty to Verify It Stays With You.
An AI safety camera or sensor is a control measure like any other, and usually the weakest kind. This guide sets out the WHS duty it touches, where it sits in the hierarchy, and how to deploy and verify one without fooling yourself.
Read article
AI Work Allocation and Psychosocial Risk: The WHS Duty NSW Teams Already Hold
AI work-allocation and monitoring tools create psychosocial hazards that NSW WHS law already requires PCBUs to identify, control and consult on. Here is the duty, the verified provisions, and a risk-assessment workflow.
Read article
AI for Incident Analysis and Leading Indicators: A Human-in-the-Loop WHS Playbook
A practical, human-in-the-loop guide for Australian financial-services WHS teams. Use AI to surface leading indicators across de-identified incident data and to propose ICAM-style contributing factors, while keeping the notifiability decision firmly with a competent person.
Read article
AI-Assisted Psychosocial Risk Assessment: A WHS Governance Workflow That Keeps the Sign-Off Human
A practical WHS governance workflow for Australian financial-services teams: use AI to synthesise de-identified survey data and draft the written psychosocial risk assessment, while a competent person always sets the rating, chooses the controls, and signs off.
Read articleInteractive tools
Put it into practice
The framework
Model WHS laws, adopted differently
Read this first. Australia's Work Health and Safety laws are model laws maintained by Safe Work Australia and enacted by each jurisdiction. Most states and territories have adopted them, but Victoria and Western Australia differ, and Commonwealth employers sit under the Comcare and WHS Act 2011 (Cth) scheme. Every workflow on this page keeps a competent person in control of the risk rating, the controls, and the notifiability decision.
Disclaimer. Content on this page is general information only. It is not legal, WHS, or professional advice. WHS duties vary by jurisdiction. Always consult the model WHS laws and the regulator for your jurisdiction, and seek qualified advice where required. Risk ratings, controls, and notification decisions must be made by a competent person. All AI outputs described here require human review before use.