This page is an educational summary for professionals working with AI. It is not the law and not legal advice. Always work from the current authoritative text linked below.
What does RG 274 do?
RG 274 explains ASIC's interpretation of the design and distribution obligations, its expectations for compliance, and its general approach to administering them. It walks through the target market determination content requirements in section 994B(5), including review triggers, which are events that reasonably suggest the determination is no longer appropriate, and through the separate obligation to take reasonable steps so that distribution is consistent with the determination. Read the guide on the ASIC website.
Who does it bind?
Strictly, nothing. The binding obligations are in Part 7.8A of the Corporations Act 2001 and fall on issuers and distributors of financial products. RG 274 is guidance, and ASIC administers the statutory obligations against it.
What do practitioners get wrong?
Treating the target market determination as the whole compliance task. It is not. The design and distribution obligations also impose a standing reasonable steps duty on distribution conduct, which is where most supervisory attention lands.
Where does AI use touch it?
Distribution targeting. A model that selects who sees a product, or personalises how it is presented, is a distribution step that must remain consistent with the determination, and its behaviour needs to be observable enough to feed the review triggers. See DDO and AI-driven personalisation and boundary testing a TMD.
Bottom line
RG 274 is ASIC's reading of Part 7.8A, not the obligation itself. Read it for what a defensible determination and defensible distribution conduct look like.
TheAICommand. Intelligence, At Your Command.
